Contact

Reaching the editorial team at Fantasy Strategy Guide is straightforward — whether the question is about a specific article, a suggested topic, or a factual correction on something like positional scarcity or FAAB bidding mechanics. This page explains how to get a message to the right place, what the team covers, what to include for a faster response, and what a realistic turnaround looks like.

How to reach this office

The primary contact method is the email form hosted on this domain. Messages sent through the form route directly to the editorial inbox — no intermediary service, no ticketing queue that loses things between the cracks.

For subject-specific inquiries, it helps to be specific in the subject line. A message titled "Question about auction draft strategy" will reach the right desk faster than one titled "Fantasy sports help." The team responsible for auction draft content is not the same group handling daily fantasy sports or fantasy baseball, so routing matters.

There is no phone support. There is no live chat. This is a reference publication, not a customer service operation — and the tradeoff is that the written responses tend to be more thorough than anything a chat widget could produce at 11 p.m. on a Tuesday.

Service area covered

Fantasy Strategy Guide covers the full scope of competitive fantasy sports formats played in the United States — from redraft snake leagues and best ball to dynasty and keeper formats. The editorial scope spans football, basketball, baseball, hockey, golf, NASCAR, and daily fantasy contests across all major platforms.

The contact team handles questions and correspondence related to:

1. Content corrections — factual errors in published articles, outdated player data, or analysis that no longer reflects current scoring norms
2. Editorial suggestions — topics not yet covered, formats that deserve more depth, or angles on league settings strategy that haven't been addressed
3. Licensing and syndication — requests to republish, cite, or adapt content from this site
4. Partnership and research inquiries — collaborations with analysts, data providers, or academic researchers studying fantasy sports participation

What falls outside the scope: personal lineup advice, start/sit decisions for a specific week, and trade evaluations for individual teams. The start/sit decisions and trade strategy guide pages exist precisely to handle those questions at scale, with frameworks that apply across thousands of roster configurations rather than one.

What to include in your message

A well-constructed message gets a substantive response. A vague one gets a short one. The difference usually comes down to 3 things.

Specific reference to the content in question. If the message is about an article, include the page title or URL. "Your article on waiver wire strategy has an outdated section on priority vs. FAAB systems" is actionable. "I had a question about waivers" requires a follow-up before anything useful can happen.

Context about the format being played. Fantasy baseball scoring in a 5x5 rotisserie league (rotisserie vs. head-to-head) operates on entirely different logic than a points-based format. A question about streaming strategies that doesn't specify the platform or scoring system is answerable only in the most general terms.

A clear ask. Corrections, suggestions, and partnership inquiries all have different workflows. Stating the purpose upfront — "I'd like to flag a factual error" versus "I'm interested in content licensing" — routes the message correctly on the first pass.

For licensing and partnership inquiries specifically, include the name of the organization, the intended use, and the approximate scope. A researcher studying advanced stats in fantasy sports for an academic paper has different needs than a media outlet looking to republish a trade value chart.

Response expectations

The editorial inbox is reviewed on business days, Monday through Friday. Messages received over the weekend are processed starting Monday morning.

For content corrections submitted with a specific article reference and a clear description of the error, the standard turnaround is 2 to 3 business days — faster if the correction is straightforward, longer if it requires pulling source data or updating an analysis that touches connected pages like player projections or ADP strategy.

Editorial suggestions go into a review process. Not every suggestion results in a published page, but every substantive one is read and considered against the existing content roadmap. Topics that fall within the site's scope — particularly underserved areas like IDP strategy, two-quarterback league mechanics, or fantasy NASCAR — tend to move faster through that process than topics already covered at depth.

Licensing and partnership inquiries receive a preliminary response within 5 business days. Complex arrangements take longer to scope and document, but the initial acknowledgment happens quickly.

One thing worth saying plainly: the team does not respond to messages that are abusive, that demand personalized lineup advice, or that are clearly automated. The inbox is operated by people, and that cuts both ways.